American directors left
Into the Wild: How Unity but says Crespi not a masterpiece, could fall in love. But it is just like falling in love with film - and similar characters? Brontolin will now try to provide an antidote for those who have been a victim of the curse, hoping that it is not so much read as a tirade against Sean Penn, as a modest contribution to clarify that honesty and consistency are not always present in many films have the lack of easily duped. And too bad if the filmmaker claims to have a moral and political mission!
the problem with this film is that we tend to judge by the idea that one form of the character. Instead we should go beyond the character that can only be understood if you understand the movie!
here, in short, the creative path that has layered three different buildings of the same American myth, producing Into the Wild (silent many details, of course).
1) before Christopher McCandless, fed reads like Tolstoy, Thoreau and London, tears up his identity to build a new one, with many good intentions and courage, but also with such pulp stereotypes. In fact, far beyond the solitary journey of the Beat writers, Alexander Supertramp sail safely to a autoconsacrazione-merger with the immensity of nature and freedom, in respect of which perhaps the death was not the intended end. Maybe underneath it planned to return home and become a famous writer, from her own autobiography novel: not for nothing that he wrote a diary in the third person!
because nature that Alexander has in mind is not neutral, that is learned through layers and layers of cultural accumulation, is the American wilderness, dangerous, fascinating, but also tied to a mystical sense of predestination to the great things that touches all Americans, just because the Americans are identified by this:
Americans are not the chosen people because the Messiah will be born. are the chosen people because they have built their identity through travel and the conquest of the wilderness, defied the immensity of space, have lived together with the most hostile environment, we have established their own small living area, and solitude are found pride and the basis of their right to property (and growing ad libitum).
2) for the second coming Jon Krakauer, the mountaineer, journalist, joining the myth to the purse, with pleasure, and trained as a genuine player on the Stanislavski method identifies herself, retraces the steps of Alexander, reconstructs his journey, he meets the same people, sucking the same visions, suffers the same freeze and eventually writes a best-seller!
3) last but not least, here is Sean Penn , Stanislavski that it's in the curriculum, there he read the book, do the same thing, even forcing the crew to climb hills with all the equipment and re-create visually the myth, romantic myth-American man who, unlike the European romantic, in dealing with the immense, disappears or is witness tiny, but looms in turn, conquered the heights of the mountains and especially the depth of his spirit and the mythologized, shows her as a model to imitate, saint and martyr of the idea of \u200b\u200bindividual freedom which, although defeated on the material - because of failure should be treated - inviting them to follow, each in its small way, each in its own way to build the own myth of freedom, then ... devoted to her family. Well as one intuits from the weir.
not at all, as rightly noted Paul, a film that should be a refusal of an escape from the well-being and to 'things'. is instead made with a rich style, sleek, National Geographic, a style that looks more like the origins of Christopher, who travels to a beggar!
0 comments:
Post a Comment